The participants who learn most: an admissions philosophy

Arrow icon down
Arrow icon down
The participants who learn most: an admissions philosophy

The participants who get the most from an executive programme are those who arrive willing to be wrong in public. A finance director who admits they have never understood capital allocation properly. A chief executive who says the transformation they led three years ago failed and they still are not sure why. The opposite is also true. Participants who arrive to confirm what they already know leave with exactly that.

This is not a question of seniority or credentials. Some of the most transformative work in our cohorts has come from participants with less conventional backgrounds than the obvious high performers in the room. The question is one of disposition and honesty.

  • An honest self-assessment is one where a participant names the gap directly, rather than treating the programme as validation of existing capability
  • A durable piece of learning is one the participant can apply to work they are actually doing, not a framework they can recite
  • The value of a programme is measured eighteen months out, when the participant faces the decision the teaching was meant to prepare them for
Blog post image

The questions we ask applicants

Before any place is offered, we ask three questions of every applicant: what decision are you currently getting wrong? What would have to change for this programme to be worth the time? And what will you do differently in the first month afterwards? Applicants who cannot answer these are asked to reapply when they can, regardless of how senior they are.

  • Track record is assessed for what the applicant learned from it, not the scale of the organisation behind it
  • Readiness is evaluated through direct conversation with faculty, not through a written application alone
  • Motivation is tested honestly, because a participant sent by their employer rarely engages
  • Cohort fit is weighed carefully, because the room teaches as much as the faculty do
"The best cohorts we have taught are the ones where someone said, in the first session, that they had no idea how to do the thing they were responsible for. That is the test."